BBC Acorn/Archimedes and MK Ultra PART 1: Bridging the Mind to the Computer

“MK Ultra never ended” is a term I see being thrown around here and there but ask them why and you might find it difficult to get an explaination.

What I have come to learn is that MK Ultra all centres around ARM, a computer language  architecture that most of the worlds biggest tech giants revolve around. Elon Musk, Bill Gates, the late Steve Jobs and computer programmers all around the world will be very familiar with this computer construct. What many may not realise is that this computer technology has been around us for more than 30 years and began on a machine that was partly funded by the British Broadcasting Corporation.

ARM, originally Acorn RISC Machine, later Advanced RISC Machine, is a family of reduced instruction set computing (RISC) architectures for computer processors, configured for various environments. British company ARM Holdings develops the architecture and licenses it to other companies, who design their own products that implement one of those architectures—‌including systems-on-chips (SoC) and systems-on-modules (SoM) that incorporate memory, interfaces, radios, etc. It also designs cores that implement this instruction set and licenses these designs to a number of companies that incorporate those core designs into their own products.” Reference

I wonder how many people remember the BBC/ACORN Archimedes computers? British children born in the 70’s/80’s are likely to remember them being used in schools and universities during the 1980’s and early 90s as part of student education, whilst many teachers and professors would have been involved in their development. Many of these machines featured learning and games programs as well as primitive word processing tools.

By today’s standards the Acorn Archimedes computer could be considered to be extremely slow and basic, yet these computers were some of the first to incorporate ARM architecture, a computer language which is a standard used in modern mobile and tablet devices. ARM architecture is essentially the backbone which makes up any particular computer system that is designed today. It could be compared to how an architect designs a building around the physics of the real world. Therefore, if a computer company or individual wishes to build a new processor, a licence must be obtained in order to use the ARM architecture.

“Companies can obtain an ARM architectural licence for designing their own CPU cores using the ARM instruction sets. These cores must comply fully with the ARM architecture. Companies that have designed cores that implement an ARM architecture include Apple, AppliedMicro, Broadcom, Cavium, Nvidia, Qualcomm, and Samsung Electronics.” -Wikipedia

Sumerian/Chinese Maths Systems and A.R.M

From what I understand, ARM at its core incorporates a very basic Sumerian/Chinese mathematical system.

The system itself was found to make large calculations easier, particularly multiplication and division using very simple rule sets. It was this system that modern mathematicians found to be the quickest and easiest methods to work with when it came to computer design.

This system allows, addition, subtraction, Multiplication and Division to be represented as a physical map, hence the architecture of ARM has patterns of number much like geometry. You could say that modern computers in some ways are more or less physically shaped by the numerical system that they use in order to represent data.

The father of the modern computer Alan Turin was well aware of this, and is why some of his most exotic studies involved those of self organizing systems in nature. These studies included the analysis of aerial reconnaissance pictures taken of land forms such as coastlines and forests.

LSD and Technology: The MK Ultra Connection.

After doing a bit of digging online, it seems that one of the BBC Micro/ACORN computers incorporated a computer processor made by Rockwell (a now defunct aerospace manufacturer). More specifically, the Model B+64 featured a “Rockwell Semiconductor 6512A at 2 MHz” built by Conexant Systems, Inc a division of Rockwell International, before being spun off as a public company.

Teledyne is a company that is still running today and has been noted for buying out some of the worlds leading technology manufacturers. Rockwell Scientific Company LLC was one company bought out by Teledyne (major US defence contractor) in 2006 for $167.5 million in cash?!?!?!?!?! Its not often you hear a story like that, almost like something out of a film where a deal is made with a briefcase full of cash.

Teledyne, Conexant Systems and Rockwell all have a link to the CIA Project MK Ultra through a man called Alfred Matthew Hubbard.

Hubbard was directly involved with MK Ultra, particularly in the area of LSD experimentation but he is also noted for being involved with other projects, particularly in engineering. Alfred Matthew Hubbard was referred to as the “Johnny Appleseed of LSD” and known to his peers as “The Captain”.

From a google books source, it would appear that Alfred Matthew Hubbard was once an employee for Teledyne in 1960.

Martin A. Lee and co-author Bruce Shalin strongly indicate that Captain was in fact an asset in their classic study Acid Dreams: A Complete Social History of LSD: The CIA, the Sixties, and Beyond:

“The Captain also engaged in undercover work for a number of other government agencies, including the Federal Narcotics Bureau and the Food and Drug Administration (at a time when both organizations were assisting the CIA’s drug testing programs.) During the mid-1960s he was employed by Teledyne, a major defence subcontractor, as ‘director of human factors research.’ In this capacity Hubbard served as adviser and consultant to a combined navy and NASA project that involved testing the effects of psycho-chemical agents on newly designed ‘helicopter avionics system.’

Teledyne worked closely with various government organizations, including the CIA, to apply these techniques to additional areas of military interest.

“While Hubbard was not a CIA operative per se, his particular area of expertise –hallucinogenic drugs –brought him into close contact with elements of the espionage community.”…ver-Apple.html

Information on Alfred Matthew Hubbard is limited but what seems clear is that LSD played a critical part in the development of computer technology. My reasons for this are based on a few aspects. The first is clear that Conexant, Rockwell and Teledyne had some use for LSD experiments through their connection to Hubbard and the CIA. The second is what is described by Michael S Schnider in the video to be computers links to natural mathematics.

Our own brains are natures most powerful computers and in terms of mathematical calculations, the Sumerian/Chinese methods of number crunching is what both our minds and computers are suited to. It could be considered that natures own mathematical system or key is the same system.

Therefore, MK Ultras LSD experiments are most likely to have been conducted as “brain hacks” in order to open up and study the mind for its secrets. Computers would have been used alongside to input the results for use in further experimentation drawn from conclusive data.

Bridging the gap between computer technology and mind altering substances is a contrast, but ultimately, LSD was studied uniformly as a substance that had the potential to ‘program’ human beings. It is why many MK Ultra victims suffered greatly under the horrors of the experiments which included  methods of torture, sensitization/desensitisation techniques, sleep deprivation, starvation and so on.

Whilst LSD usage has been known for its negative effects, Alfred Matthew Hubbard is understood to have been an advocate of its usage for the bettering of humanity. But considering what MK Ultra did to people, it is likely the drug movements of the 60’s and 70’s were the first steps to introducing LSD on a large scale in order to divert public attention away from what was really happening. We could also look at other drug experiments such as The Jonestown Massacre, LSD Food poisoning at Pont-Saint-Esprit, in the Gard, southeast France 1951 and the Charles Manson Cult to see that these experiments were operating in plain site but were being spun as something else.

LSD can potentially turn on parts of the brain that are otherwise inactive at certain times of the day such as when we sleep. Therefore the experience of LSD can render a person out of touch with the balanced projection of the reality they perceive around them. Certainly if the unconscious projection we experience when sleeping can become activated under the influence of LSD, then a persons perceptions can seem to feel timeless and unworldly, much like the dream-state becoming a reality.

Modern AI has evolved to calculate incredibly complex mathematical problems within fractions of a second. Perhaps the most ground breaking event was when DNA code was cracked for the first time during the 90’s. DNA code is vastly complex and many thought it would not be able to be cracked for many years to come. GM (genetically modified) foods would not have been possible without computer advancements as computer were used to fill in the ‘gaps’ of DNA that would have otherwise taken many years just to complete one single sequence.

In a matter of 35 years, we have moved from silicon processors to quantum processing. In terms of practical needs, quantum processing  is not really a nessessity for the home environment. In fact, computing power used on todays modern machines is far beyond capable of dealing with office based tasks. Quantum computing is perhaps something that could be viewed as a server processor for the future, one which intends to act as a network of host computers that will crunch large amounts of data for millions of computers at a time, all in real-time.



Today I had a catch up with a friend who is being targeted in London.

From the conversation, I can gather that their targeting has reached a plateau much like my own. It seems that there are limitations to what involvement perpatrators have in harassing others. That is the defining line of privacy which regardless of what is happening, doesn’t allow those other than the police to invade the privacy of others. It still seems strange to say that but in reality of the law, survellience powers are what they are.

The civil line of privacy is still obviously being broken on a day to day basis, and is maintained through the classic indirect traits that the harassment operations continue with, by using collected data on targets.

I wished to address with my friend concerns about TI involvement with the media channel Vice.

Today, I researched further into this alternative news channel which is the only company I know of to date that has attempted to approach the “TI” phenomena. What I came to discover is that a majority of this company is owned by some of the industries big companies such as Disney and Fox news. Vice also has links to companies which were involved in the phone hacking scandals earlier in the decade. That is the name Rupert Murdock popped up to no surprise. His involvement in ownership was around 2013.

To date, Vice have made two documentaries about Targeted Individuals, of which feature a  number of TIs which participate in online blogging about their experiences. One of which I have already blogged about, Dr. Katherine Horton and Keiron Lee Perrin whom in comparison has done more extensive TI based forums to the public.

A person whom I have not talked about is Scott Gibbs whom is now the most current blogger of TI Television. As far as Scott is concerned, I don’t really have much to say. I have watched a number of his videos and much of them talk about his experiences with clarity.

Keiron is a very notable TI because he is the only TI who has presented some form of evidence of implantation. Regardless of if you believe his case for implantation, Keiron states that these implants were performed by the military, which is a pretty strong story. Considering, implants are now currently being talked about and in some cases, becoming a reality, the amount of information that Keiron has brought to the public can hardly thoughout to be considered “far-fetched” anymore.

With this said, it wouldn’t be correct to say that Vice is shilling the TI situation, unless of course the move is to discredit the lot with a court case in the near future.

Of course, discrediting is one of the many areas Targeted Individuals face. If Vice is attempting to use actors to then in turn discredit their own creation, then it would be one of the only logical move a shilling operation would take. But, it would seem a very brave move considering that they cover topics of survellience with just as much vigor.

Vice makes a lot of money it seems, running into the billions and it has been pointed out by some TIs that are not part of the Twitter collective that there are many TIs with a lot of important information that Vice chose to overlook for the first documentary. It was noted by Andy Lewis, a TI that can be found on Facebook, that the first documentary appears to undermine the whole subject by portraying the targets as stupid.

Despite that this documentary is part investigatory, the style of it can be compared to satirical comedy documentaries which came to rise in the late 90’s such as The Day Today and Brasseye, two programmes masterminded by TV scriptwriter and Actor, Chris Morris.

The Day Today and Brasseye were what I can describe as “Mediamockumentaries” which were designed to pull apart the pompus aspects of the media at the time, although I find myself reading many comments from the public whom think that the current state of the media today was a prediction on Chris Morris’s part. For some, The Day Today and Brassye could be considered the successor of Spitting Image, which stopped airing in Britain during the late 90’s.

Brasseye in particular grabbed headlines because of its aparent misleding of celebrities into commiting into “madeup” senarios. These included convincing MPs, Actors, Tv presenters, Musicians and so on into believing they were campaigning against drugs, pedophila and other controversial topics. At the time, Brasseye, caused serious controversy with one epidsode that centred around Pedophiles, where Ofcom recieved one of the highest list of complaints of all time. The pranks were later seen to reveal that some of the celebrities were only participating for social recognition, whilst some of the others later came to be charged with sex offences. Many who have seen Brasseye will know that Jimmy Saville (who didnt appear in the program), was repeatedly mocked and was later revealed to be a pedophile.

My point here is that despite what is known about pedophiles in the TV industry, Brasseye was one of the first programs to bring about a form of public shaming before any from of court case came about. This is something we are seeing more of today, certainly with the recent public shamings of celebrities of Harvey Weinstein and Kevin Spacey, are we overlooking the fact that this was one of the aims of MK Ultra, to create a society just like we have now?

It is of worthy note, that some celebrities who were accussed of various crimes had their carrers completely ruined despite being proved innocent later on. Is it possible that those in the industry are just as vulnerable to control as the rest of us? To be used for news stories and profit?

With this said, I find that the second documentary by Vice changed its tune to a more serious standpoint, and that comments found on the video channel were not filled with as much mockery as the first. It seems that people are beginning to consider that MK Ultra is not as full of fantasy as the media spin it. Personally I think its because that these programs are becoming more predictable, and with survellience the way it is, it effects everyone now, not just the isolated experiment.

With a number of TV programs that are due to be realised that focus on the subject of MK Ultra, I believe that the most recent two series of Netflix “Stranger Things” was just merely an icebreaker to making money out of those whom have suffered under the name of illegal human experimentation.

With all this said, perhaps Tis featured in the Vice documentaries are genuine after all. If celebrities can be so easily manipulated into positions where their careers are put on the line, the vulnerablity of individuals whom are being targeted by portions of the community at large are perhaps just as likely to be used for the purpose of spinning the picture the way the media want it.

To contrast to the world of organised harassment, Vice has a lot of money and the world of showbusiness at its fingertips. I wouldn’t think for one second, that an actor isn’t out of their reach, especially ones that can be taught how to think and act like a TI. The reasons for this are simple. Obtaining TI information isn’t difficult with survellience the way it is.

You can also consider that the realm of the targeted community sits in a dangerous balance. It will take one or a number of people to take a hold of this situation for it to become something more than a collection of victims and could instead considered to be something cult like in the future.

If TIs can’t see the religious stigmata following them in tow across the internet, then you might be too blind to see that the media already has ideas of how to deal with the upsurge of TIs coming forward across the planet.




The Implanted Operative: Tech and Psychology

The world of Psychiatry is having a difficult time dealing with the “phenomena” of Gangstalking although I’m very certain that they are working overtime to devise a way of challenging that problem.

At the moment, Psychiatry deals with “TIs” of any shape or size with medication, but ask most with some form of mental health problem and I’ll guarantee many are also treated the same with minimal help or care, if any at all. So its safe to say that when it comes to psychiatry, medication and long waiting lists are their answer to vitually everything.

In most modern sub-MSM documentaries about “Gangstalking”, the psychiatry profession is often turned to for “opinion”. Generally, a long string of textbook terminology is roled off the tongue much like an ignorant person shrugs off someone elses bad news and from person experience, psychiatrists will dodge the subject in person much the same. But with mounting evidence of community harassment happening amongst us everyday, I fail to see the relevance of psychiatry’s “opinion” or usefulness when evidence enters into the forefront of an increasing problem.

If you can’t see this already then it needs to be said, but organised harassment in the community doesn’t intend to stay hidden (in certain terms) forever.

The reason for this is that for the effort and money that goes into this mass project would not be without purpose and it is those purposes that need to be addressed. Many Tis can see this and talk about it in great depth, But personally, I think its a waste of time. We only have to look at the employees of California Tech company Three Square Market sleep walking into a nightmare by volunteering for implant tech, tech which has already been tested on TIs for years.

Harassment operatives are well known to be found knitted into the professions of psychiatry and and the health systems. It would be foolish to think otherwise but they are only protected through ignorance and a set of carefully attuned protocols that are just part and parcel of workforce driven laws. That is to say, that getting someone to help you depends on how much they value their job and credibilty. Otherwise, there isn’t much standing in the way of a TI and getting the truth out.

Despite ignorance being bliss, the Psychiatry profession has a problem bridging the gap between its sceptical sciences and real science. You can see a lot of this happening in the world today. In a world obsessed with facts, psychiatry still only remains an opinion. Yet on the other side of the coin, it is used in tandem with survellience much like the mental hospital environment. So it doesn’t take a genius to work out that organisations that use mass survellience need a psychiatric voice in order to protect what they do to avoid any “wrongdoing” by the public eye.

A large percentage of us who use tecnology are subjected to AI net neutrality algorithms. It seems pretty evident that with the host of AI bots that were offically introduced online a few years ago, the aim of these projects is to extract information from every single person around the planet using a psychological format of mirroring information through any possible medium possible ranging from a picture to the clothes you wear. If you don’t think this is possible, then you might be surprised to learn that big corporate businesses will literally find meaning in anything, especially when it comes to selling you something. It breaks down into form of psychology which can then be “triggered” through prompt administered through technology. That in itself is the core foundation of hunter/gatherer iconography that the material world is built on, one which is parallel by knowledge. Much of this is talked and debated about on the web, particularly on the science channel TED.

Psychiatry and Community Harassment

Psychiatry has big involvement with the development of the AI revolution and the Organised Harassment Network so its understandable that no professional would dare to go near the subject with a barge pole and thats simply to do with how much senstive and experimental tech is is physically out there in the communities at large. Hence, this is why doctors are unlikely to be too happy to remove any weird implants you might happen to have on you. Its going to involve them having to testify in court in a society defining court case.

Therefore, the Community Harassment network is a bit harder to understand when it comes to TI testimonies. A majority of operatives are essentially working from mirroring algorithms sent to them from a mainframe server, the same ones which link to our emails, texts and almost everything we do online.

This in reality, makes them the very definition of a cyborg or even as far to say, android by nature. That purely comes down to how much an operative interacts with the tech or how advanced the tech is designed to have control over the person. Ultimately, they are more or less enslaved by agreement so the likelihood of having any sort of free will or privacy is almost zero.

These individuals are likely to be chipped and using a range of prototype tech. Others work from mobile devices but this is likely to reduce in respects to protecting the integrity of the technology they carry. So implants are likely to be manditory.

These operatives on observation have traits where a majority of their tactics of distraction aren’t always directed at the target for purpose of harassment, it is designed to stop the target analysing for the source of information theft.

Therefore, individuals carrying implants make extracting evidence harder. Although they are likely to carry a mobile device, the server code will be written into an unassuming program from the company that is hosting the data link. So on perception, any harassment operative will have a clean device.

Operatives will be directly linked to your device or a number of devices at any given time, functioning much like a hive mind. What you touch on your screen or the information you are sent in a live feed with be programmed to prompt, interacting and predicting reactions.

This physical human extraction is extraordinarily creepy because it can also be used alongside developing vechile tech. Harassment operatives interact with the target with a number of various methods but it depends on the platform being used.

The scrolling method a lot of use on our mobile devices is much like a runway of information. Particularly in areas where transport is in high frequency, AI vechiles can be used to synch with data on a target device as they scroll through information. Operatives can also sensitize targets to particular bits of information that present themselves on a newsfeed.

Operatives find it much harder to interact if all sensors, cameras and microphones are covered or if there is a lack of internet or no connection. Effectively, you are not only unplugging from the web but unplugging from operatives who are experiencing your information and others through neural interface.

One aim of these experiments is attempts to humanize technology but you should look to your own personal life for key indicators to understanding what programming you could expect in the future. Hence, much of the situations are simulated and require a lot of pre-planning, programming and being in the precence of employees of the company that target you. All of this can happen around you in real-life.

Are operatives implanted more than TIs?

This is a highly debatable question and it comes down to an aspect we could call information denial protocol.

TIs in contrast to operatives question about implants, so it is probable that some TIs have brain implant interfaces that extract only but can interact should there be need to. This makes communication a one way interaction. Therefore the system will not co-operate with a TI, only monitor them. In contrast, an operative with implants will be able to interact with the system remotely but it depends on what that person wants from the system in regards to requirement or need.  If the information request is considered a threat, it will be denied because certain thought patterns might be identified to be ones that extract information from the system for purposes other than that of what they are required to do. This defines the very nature of how an operative spends their spare time, as it will be with the community, alongside their targets, they’re job, is now their life.

If we can assume that an operative will never come out about the truth of what they do, then it would be highly likely they would be too scared to think of talking publicly about it because their thoughts are being read in real-time. That is the unfortunate catch 22 of being an operative from what I can gather. So to bring into context, operatives with implants can only respond to order, and their free will would be unquestionably be comprimised.

But this comes down to what type of experiment you are part of. Many Tis believe they are implanted. Considering how difficult it is to get a body scan in a general hospital, the odds are that implants are being ignored because it is standard protocol.

Most individuals whom will report implants will likely be given the run around. Runaround tactics are time wasting protocols used often in the psychiatrict professions. It is why many people who have some type of mental health problem will not have a dedicated psychiatrist or if they do, sometimes, protocols are used to breakdown frequency of visits. It is designed to distance help from the individual no matter how helpful it is presented.

General hospital protocols are designed in a similar way. Mention the word “implant” and it will be recognised as “mental health illness protocol” by a nurse or if it isn’t it will be by someone in higher authority.

Implants are the next stage of the big agenda. What isn’t commonly known is that they have been trialed and tested extensively in society for years in many various ways.

What you need to do is question is the nature of individual intelligence.

This is a question to my knowledge is yet unapproached.

How an implant interacts with a human presents serious questions.

If we are to assume there are individuals in society receiving information directly into their brains through the use of wireless connection, then the way that human is presented to the rest of us is a lie and may possess talents and abilities that would not be present without it.

It means that a person of intellicutal excellence could in fact be completely under the control of a machine. What we need to ask, is that if this person is disconnected from a hive mind system, does that person still retain the same intelligence or connectivity. Much like unplugging someone from the matrix. Unfortunately, if you have no love of the Matrix films, this is the reality that might be facing everyone.

There are some TI’s that report having discovered brain implants but others suspect ones that are less invasive on thoughts but were used only for the purpose of GPS tracking only.

However, the way the machine chooses to interact with you is not a coincious choice unless you personally programmed it or are part of a system which grants you control over the information.

This to me presents a utopia of control through true or false knowledge. The aim it seems is to disconnect the creative and functional part of the brain which enables us to problem solve.

This is why the psychiatry profession has placed itself on top of the debates and the the barage of thought provoking arguments found in the realm of net neutrality in order to use their operatives to test a number of complex systems.

What they are ultimately silent on is dealing with the reality of implants. Approaching it would essentially ruin a majority of big tech projects currently in operation and on a large scale, serious ethical and human rights questions would need to be answered.

No matter how alone you may feel as a TI, I guarantee there isn’t someone to far away from you who is also being targeted or being used on the other side of the coin of human experimentation.